My fan motor has developed an intermittent loud and embarrassing squeal. I assume this is a failed bearing. I would try to repair it but there is little if any information available and no parts are listed. Replacement (pattern, non-Lucas) motors are available and relatively cheap, so I ordered one. The motor is mounted in a bracket and this is only attached to the car by 2 bolts and an electrical connection to the otter switch. I disconnected the connection at the clip joint and disconnected the battery in case of accidental shorts. This "ought" to be an easy job. The recommended route is to remove the fan from the motor- detach the motor and then remove the front grill and remove the motor through this space. To remove the fan remove the top safety grill.
|
Unscrew the two bolts that secure the upper protection grill and remove it. |
If you think you can remove the fan then do it at this stage. There are two access slots cut into the fan centre surround and one of these aligns with a small grub screw holding the fan hub to the motor shaft.
|
New fan showing grub screw in fan boss opposite slot in fan "upstand" |
Unscrew this and the fan should detach. This has to be tight to hold the fan securely, but it is also exposed to the elements and spray blown around by the fan itself. Faced with this problem you might perhaps have thought to use a decent, probably stainless steel for the grub screw. Maybe you'd have thought to use an Allen type to allow a reasonable force to be exerted?
As you've guessed BMC did none of this. Firstly they seem to have cast around for a suitable dairy product from which to make the screw, eventually settling on some form of hard cheese. If they ever thought of an Allen head, that thought didn't trouble them greatly and they seem to have dismissed it with ease. Consequently any attempt to remove this screw results in stripping the head. I note that it is recommended to use copaslip or similar when assembling this screw, but BMC didn't do that either. Consequently I have to remove the fan and motor as a unit so unscrew the motor mounting bolts (2)
|
Remove the two bolts that secure the fan motor mounting bracket below the scuttle.
|
This creates problems. The motor/fan assembly cannot come out in front of the radiator because the radiator would need to be moved backwards. The radiator is mounted via a flange on each side which is bolted onto the front of the welded body side panels (2 bolts each side). This flange prevents the radiator from moving backwards. I did try it and remove these bolts but predictably, even though the radiator bolts were removed and the hoses are flexible, the radiator can still not be moved backwards the mere inch or so necessary to make removal of the motor/fan unit possible.
|
Radiator mounting. Note welded body panel steadied by means of 2 top stays that themselves are secured to the radiator mounting bolts. Note also that these bolts penetrate the flange on the side of the radiator so the rad cannot go towards the rear of the car even if unbolted. You can also see the ridge where the bottom tank meets the core and which will be troublesome later. |
I did remove the front grill panel (self tapping screws) but I can confirm that the fan plus motor cannot come out this way, although its quite possible the motor alone might. However for that you would need to be able to remove the fan.... Consequently the only way that is now possible is to drain the system and remove the radiator. Just see how a simple job has grown!!
However, even this isn't without its problems. The radiator bolts have already been removed as above. This only generates limited movement because the lower hose is thoughtfully and lovingly entwined with the fibreboard ducting and anti-roll bar.
|
Radiator bottom hose penetrates fibreboard ducting and passes beneath the antiroll bar underneath. |
There's nothing for it but to disconnect the bottom hose (because the radiator was thoughtfully not provided with a drain tap) and drain the system. Then its a simple matter to lift the radiator upwards.... hang on.. what's this? The radiator has a ridge above the lower tank (just visible in the picture above in front of the fibreboard). This means the radiator has to be moved rearwards to clear the body at the front of the car before you can lift it up... but you cannot move it rearwards AND raise it because the bottom hose spigot fouls on the body and antiroll bar. A triumph of design! Just 0.5 cm more clearance would have made this simple. As it is you are forced to wrestle the large, heavy- and surprisingly delicate radiator out by twisting it and applying side forces at odd angles which I hope won't break the soldered seams. Eventually it came out and I may investigate cutting some of the body to make the job easier next time! The fan and motor can then at last be removed!
** Should add here that although I've been critical of the design here, on removing the rad, I did notice that it was distorted. The lower tank was flattened and the top tank bent into a curve. I was in two minds as to what to do... new rad or repair, but having costed both I opted for repair (straighten tanks, new core) since they could fit a drain tap at the same time for about the same price as a new rad. The repairers recognised both the radiator as an MGB item- and the damage immediately. Apparently its very common and caused by jacking the car up on the rad... duuuh!!! Embarrassingly I think they thought I'd done it... honest guys, I'm an innocent man!
I had ordered a new motor but it was my intention to remove and re-use the fan. As the screwhead was stripped I tried to find an impact driver to use on the remnants. However the screw is too small for my impact hammer head whilst the obvious ridge around the fan prevents close access anyway.
|
Fan and motor removed as a unit (still attached to mounting bracket). One of the grub screw access slots is visible allowing screwdriver access to the fan hub screw. |
I was therefore forced to drill the screw out. Obviously the recess around the fan made drill access impossible and I had to enlarge the screw access slot in the plastic to do this. The screw did drill out fairly easily, although the fan would still not move. I tried penetrating oil which didn't help it and neither did hammering. The design of the fan prevented all means of holding the central boss in a vice so that the motor shaft could be driven out. The only means available was to hold the fan by hand. This had 2 effects; firstly the motor boss wouldn't move because the hammering force was absorbed by the fan, and secondly my fingers were injured when much of the force was dissipated there on the occasions that the hammer missed! Much swearing. After 4 hrs on this 20min job I gave up and cut the fan blades and central upstand off with an angle grinder. I could now grip the fan boss in a vice and tap the motor shaft out backwards. Once the boss was secure it came off very easily. I removed this remnant of the fan and also the washers and circlip beneath. All in all, this struggle shows me that it would have been impossible to remove the fan in position even if the grub screw hadn't failed. I think it highly unlikely anyone will get away without removing the rad for this job. Strangely a new fan costs more than a new motor- I can't understand that, but obviously I had to order one.
New fan came with a much meatier screw fitted instead of the grub screw. This was an M5 thread and probably different from the original. I decided that I could replace this with either an m5 Allen headed grub screw or a hex bolt. The grub screw was a little short so for the time being I've opted for the bolt. Not sure how this last (or the new meaty screw) will affect balance and vibration in use so I may revisit this if I have a problem. I tapered its end to help it locate on the motor drive shaft.
|
New fan screw as supplied and a hex bolt with tapered point. Ill try both and assess for vibration. |
Even though I wont be reusing this motor I hate throwing anything away and wanted to see if it could be saved. My ham-fisted work with the angle grinder had shortened the motor drive shaft, but not so much that it was unusable. I decided therefore to investigate the source of the squeal and see if I could repair the motor.
The motor is a Lucas type 9GM. There is a misprint in the Lucas manual and so the part number for the complete motor unit is either 78586 or 78568.
|
Fan motor exploded |
The motor is held together by 2 long through bolts. At the front the nuts are thoughtfully recessed into the end cap so you can't grip them with a spanner or socket, but you can jam them against the body of the motor with a screwdriver whilst you undo the bolt heads at the other end.
|
Motor front cap. Note mouldings that prevent you gripping the through bolt nuts. |
|
Rear of the motor fan unit showing the through bolts. |
The front of the motor (fan end) then pulls off. The brush plate is attached to this end cap and comes away with it on the inside.
|
Looking inside the front end cap. Brush plate secured by 3 phillips screws. |
The brush plate can be easily removed.
|
Brush plate removed |
|
rear of brush plate |
The brushes looked worn both in the sense that they were shorter than I'd expected, but also they had acquired a stepped profile where they've press on the commutator. I now realise that in fact they are not particularly short, but I don't think the stepped profile is correct. Unfortunately, I have nothing to compare them with so if anyone knows how these should look please let me know.
|
Brush close up... note stepped profile in the front |
This profile suggested to me that the brushes have been riding on the raised section of the commutator (see below). I'm not sure, but it seems to me that they should run on the flat section where there is plenty of room, so perhaps the motor spindle has been moving fore and aft as it turns pulling the brushes too far back? This could explain the intermittent squeal.
The spindle commutator can then be pulled out of the motor body against the magnetism trying to retain it.
|
Commutator. Note fwd bushing land is a bit dirty as its the more exposed. The motor has no means of lubricating these bushes. Also the flat brush section is more than big enough to accommodate the brushes without them riding on the ridged section below it. |
The commutator spins in two bushes, a blind bush pressed into the rear of the case, and a through bush held onto the front endcap by a star washer.
|
Rear spindle bush- no play detected here. |
|
Front spindle through-bush. Note the bush is held by a star washer which does permit some movement. There was little if any movement between the spindle and the bush itself. |
This front bush did seem to have some movement but I think it was more to do with movement of the bush itself in the star washer than wear in the bush. I had expected ball bearings and I understand some upgraded motor versions do feature these (as does my new replacement in fact). In my case both bushes appeared in good condition. There was little play between shaft and rear bush and what was evident at the front appeared to result from movement of the whole bush against the star washer retaining it rather than between shaft and bush. I will strip this down and assess more thoroughly. The front bush is retained by the teeth of the star washer engaging with a groove in the bush. Closer examination revealed that the washer's teeth were uneven in length and many weren't "locking" into the groove. I think this is the origin of the to-and-fro movement that allowed the brushes to ride in an incorrect position. I should also add that the diagrams indicate a domed washer between 2 shims immediately above the floating bush outside the motor end cap (items 8 and two of 10 in the diagram above) and retained by a circlip (9). I suspect this is also a tensioning device that presses on the circlip and so pushes the bush into the motor and prevents fore and aft movement of the shaft. In my case only the circlip and one shim were present here. Perhaps the others were lost in a previous rebuild- or perhaps they've been made made obsolete by motor redesign?
|
Bush retained by star washer. Note that several teeth no longer engage with the groove on the bush |
I sought to secure the bush more firmly by fitting an external circlip in the bush groove against which the star washer could push. This secured the bush and test assembly showed that it also successfully limited the to and fro motion of the shaft. It also seems to have helped reposition the brushes although I won't know how effective this has been until I renew them.
|
Circlip in bush groove provides something firmer for the star washer teeth to press against. |
However it still appeared that the brushes were worn and needed replacing. I suspect the source of the squeal may have been the brush bases rubbing on the commutator as it span rather than the motor bearings and the odd ridged wear suggests something of the sort. It would be nice to change the brushes but no spares are listed. In the past it was possible to change them, but only by replacing the entire brush plate rather than the actual brushes themselves. This brush plate is now obsolete, although it appears very similar if not identical, to the brush plate used in the Lucas wiper motor and which is still available. This often has an extra brush for 2 speed wipers but you can remove this and use the modified plate in the fan motor. If you are interested the part number is WKB102; however it costs around £20, and as new pattern motors are only a little more than that, replacing it would be unwarranted unless you were devoted to keeping everything original.
The brushes themselves are mounted in copper seats in which they are a firm sliding fit and through which they make electrical contact. They are grooved on their sides to locate onto the brush plate. The copper seats themselves are spring mounted and permit the brushes to slide in and out along their grooves under spring pressure. Measuring the brushes showed that they are 8mm wide and 6mm thick on the grooved side, their length obviously depending on the extent of wear. Although generic grooved brushes are available, there are none of this size. However, this is a usual size for ungrooved brushes and 13.6mm 7.8x6.1 brushes are readily available. They fit for instance the 100mm Dewalt angle grinder. These are pretty cheap I got a bag of 20 for £5! However they need modification to fit into this motor and specifically they need to be grooved, cut to length and shaped.
These brushes have a wire contact which the lucas motor doesn't use but it pulls out easily.
I held the brushes gently in a vice and using a small file, filed a groove (app 1mm x 1mm) on each side.
Check that the brushes fit in the back plate and slide easily.
Without cutting the brushes are appx 2x as long as needed, and cannot retract enough to slip on the commutator.
|
Without cutting the new brushes are far too long and press on the drive shaft, They can't retract far enough to contact the commutator. |
I cut each appx in half using a hacksaw (gentle- no pressure needed). I used the half furthest from the wire contacts as this should be stronger. The old brushes slide sideways out of their copper seats and the new ones can be slipped in. This provides the electrical contact so they need to be a firm fit... but not so firm that they crack on insertion. I filed the ends with a half-round file before slipping the brush plate over the commutator and carrying out a final shaping using fine Emery cloth wrapped round the hub.
|
Replacement brushes inserted and shaped with half round file. |
Reassembly was, as they say, the reverse of dismantling . I refitted the washer and circlip to the front end cap exactly as I had found it. I don't know whether the more complex "domed plus 2 washer" arrangement illustrated is actually needed. Its clear that the design of this motor has gone through several iterations and I suspect that the simpler arrangement I found is now the norm.
|
Slipping one of the old brushes and its contact seat out if the brush plate |
|
New brushes inserted. |